What could be a consequence of reducing competition in the market post-merger?

Prepare for the SQA Higher Business Management Exam. Enhance your skills with dynamic flashcards and practice questions. Explore hints and explanations to ace your exam!

Reducing competition in the market post-merger can lead to higher prices for goods and services. When companies merge, especially if they are key players in the market, there can be a decrease in the number of alternatives available to consumers. With less competition, the newly formed entity may gain greater market power and the ability to influence pricing without the pressure of competitors undercutting them.

This reduced competition can result in fewer incentives for the merged company to keep prices low or improve product offerings, as consumers will have limited choices. In markets where competition thrives, companies are motivated to innovate and offer better prices to attract customers. However, in a less competitive environment, the focus may shift towards maximizing profits at the expense of consumer pricing.

The other options suggest outcomes that do not align with the typical consequences of a merger reducing market competition. For instance, lower prices for consumers and increased innovation typically arise from a competitive marketplace, not one where competition has diminished. Similarly, greater marketing opportunities and strategies are influenced by market dynamics, but in a less competitive environment, the drive for businesses to market effectively may be stifled as they rely on their reduced competition advantage rather than competitive differentiation.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy